98%95%92%quality threshold · 92%Thu: 95.1% passed first time6 re-runs, all recovered in line94.8%MonThuSun
Check scores
verdict · 4,182 runs
threshold 0.80mean 0.910.600.851.00re-run cluster
Proposals
Promote support-resolutions to autonomy?
Earned, not switched on: 4 of 4 weeks inside every threshold, first-pass yield 96.1% and rising, no ceiling breach. The review queue has had nothing to catch for a fortnight.
Move the correlate step to the small model?
On 500 shadowed runs the small model held 0.91 quality against your 0.80 threshold at an eighth of the cost. Projected: −$46 a week, p95 unchanged.
Raise the identity source's concurrency window?
The provider throttle held 412 items this week for a median 21s. A wider window clears the queue at no added spend; the ceiling per run is unchanged.
nothing changes until a draft is committed · a promotion is logged with its actor and demotes itself on a breach
Verdict lacks cited evidencesecurity · security-investigations · step 4 · 14 this week, all recovered in lineEscalating×14
Identity source throttledsecurity · edr_api rate limit · items held with state intact, resumed on their ownWatching×3
PR description fails the templaterepo-tasks · resolved by widening the check's context, 26 JulResolved×0
Promote support-resolutions to autonomyChecked autonomy → autonomous
The evidence
Weeks inside every threshold4 of 4
First-pass yield · trend96.1% · rising
Ceiling breaches · policy escalations0 · 3, all caught
What changes
Runs ship without waiting for review. Your checks stay in the path on every step; a failed check still pauses its item for a person. The review queue empties; the report and the error budget monitor it.
The way back
You are alerted on any exception group escalation. If the exception rate breaks the 2.5% error budget, the workflow demotes itself to checked autonomy and tells you why.